INTRODUCTION
1. The Department of the Interior requested
guidance about how to report information on
Indian trust funds in the general purpose
financial report of the Department. The Indian
trust funds are managed by Interior's Office of
Special Trustee, Office of the Secretary.
(Prior to FY 1996 the trust funds were managed
by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.) Some of the
funds belong to individual Indians, others
belong to tribes. The funds are managed by the
federal government in a trust arrangement.
While the Government's responsibility for all
of these funds is of a fiduciary nature, some
portion of the annual flows for some of the
funds have been included in the Budget of the
United States Government. (Further discussion
regarding types of funds involved is provided
on page 4.)
2. According to SFFAC 2, Entity and Display,
inclusion of a program in the section of the
budget currently entitled "Federal Programs by
Agency and Account" is conclusive evidence that
the program should be part of the reporting
entity. The question thus arises whether the
assets and activities of the Indian trust funds
should be reported in the Department of
Interior's general purpose financial
statements. Also, SFFAS 7, Accounting for
Revenue and Other Financing Sources, requires
certain disclosures regarding "dedicated
collections," including fiduciary funds.
During discussion of this issue at the FASAB,
questions arose about what type of disclosures
should be provided regarding the Indian trust
funds.
INTERPRETATION
3. The assets, liabilities and operating
transactions of the Indian trust funds are not
part of the Department of Interior and should
not be included in the balance sheet, statement
of net cost, and statement of changes in
financial position of the Department or of the
United States Government. However, the
Department does have a fiduciary responsibility
for these funds and is required to report on
them in footnotes to the financial statements
by SFFAS 7, Accounting for Revenue and Other
Financing Sources, paragraphs 83-87.
SCOPE OF INTERPRETATION
4. This Interpretation deals with what
information about Indian trust funds should be
included in the general purpose financial
report of the Department of Interior and of the
United State Government. It does not address
issues regarding (1) reporting formats for the
footnote disclosure required by SFFAS 7, (2)
inclusion or exclusion of other fiduciary funds
as components of the federal reporting entity,
(3) inclusion or exclusion of any funds or
entities in the Budget of the United States
Government, or (4) reporting on other funds
labeled "trust funds" in the federal budget,
reporting for trust funds, or reporting on
deposit funds generally.(1)
EFFECTIVE DATE
5. The interpretation is effective upon
implementation of SFFAS 7, which is effective
for reporting periods that begin after
September 30, 1997. Earlier application of
SFFAS 7 is encouraged.
APPENDIX: BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS
ENTITY CRITERIA
6. In its discussion of the budgetary
perspective, SFFAC 2 notes:
18. Care must be taken in determining the
nature of all trust funds and their
relationship to the entity responsible for
them. A few trust funds are truly fiduciary
in nature. Most trust funds included in the
budget are not of a fiduciary nature and are
used in federal financing in a way that
differs from the common understanding of
trust funds outside the federal government.
In many ways, these trust funds can be
similar to revolving or special funds in that
their spending is financed by earmarked
collections.
19. In customary usage, the term "trust fund"
refers to money belonging to one party and
held "in trust" by another party operating as
a fiduciary. The money in a trust must be
used in accordance with the trust's terms,
which the trustee cannot unilaterally modify,
and is maintained separately and not
commingled with the trustee's own funds.
This is not the case for most federal funds
that are included in the budget--the
fiduciary relationship usually does not
exist. The beneficiaries do not own the
funds and the terms in the law that created
the trust fund can be unilaterally altered by
Congress.
7. Indian trust funds are "true" trust funds in
the customary sense, in which there is a legal
fiduciary relationship between the Government
as trustee and the Indians as trustor. The
Government does not own the assets of the
funds. In some cases the Government's trustee
relationship is with individuals, in other
cases with tribes. For many of the funds
involved, a tribe or individual can use the
funds or dissolve the trust at any time;
however, there is a restriction on the use of
funds that have been received through legal
judgments. Those funds are generally not
available until the beneficiaries agree how the
funds are to be distributed among them.
8. The budget treats the two types of Indian
trust funds differently. Tribal funds are
included in the budget. Individuals' funds are
not in the budget; they are treated as deposit
funds. The Indian tribal trust funds appear to
meet Entity and Display's conclusive criterion
because of their budgetary treatment. The
question regarding these funds is whether this
implies that these funds should be reported on
the face of Interior's financial statements,
with the assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses of the Department.
9. Another question arises regarding the Indian
trust funds that do not appear to meet the
conclusive criterion: would they meet the
indicative criteria? The Department of the
Interior interprets the indicative criteria in
paragraph 44 of SFFAC 2 to mean that the Indian
trust funds do not possess any of these
characteristics.
10. Some people believe that the sixth
indicative criterion does, in fact, apply:
". . . a fiduciary relationship with a
reporting entity . . ." However, they believe
that meeting any single indicative criterion is
not necessarily sufficient to define the Indian
trust funds as part of a reporting entity.
Entity and Display cautioned expressly that "no
single indicative criterion is a conclusive
criterion."
11. Other people do not believe that even this
indicative criterion applies. They believe
that, notwithstanding the use of this
terminology, the relationship discussed in the
sixth indicative criterion concerns factors
relating to committing the component entity
financially, controlling the collection and
disbursement of funds, or having financial
interdependence. They believe that this type
of financial control and interdependence does
not exist between the Indian trust funds and
the federal government.
12. While the Indian tribal funds might appear
to meet the criteria for inclusion as a
component of the federal reporting entity (by
virtue of the budgetary criterion if no other),
the sovereignty of the Indian tribes as
entities outside the federal government, and
the fiduciary relationship between the
Government and the Indians, indicate that the
criteria stated in Entity and Display should
not be interpreted to suggest that the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of these
fiduciary funds should be reported on the face
of Interior's financial statements.
13. Entity and Display's discussion of the
budget perspective cautions that, when defining
a reporting entity, care must be taken in
determining the nature of all trust funds and
their relationship to the entity responsible
for them (SFFAC 2, para. 18). This provides
some common sense advice relevant to the Indian
trust funds.
DISCLOSURES FOR DEDICATED COLLECTIONS
14. As noted, the disclosure requirements for
dedicated collections in SFFAS 7, para. 83-87,
are applicable to the Indian trust funds. The
Department of Interior should include this
information in footnotes to its basic financial
statements. In addressing the comments
received on the exposure draft leading to
Statement 7, the Board specifically noted that:
226.1 The proposed standard did not cover
funds administered by a federal entity in a
fiduciary relationship with beneficiaries
that were not included in the entity's
financial statement. In addition, it did not
cover other funds which are of the same
nature as many trust funds. The standard now
requires disclosures for these funds also.
APPROVED:
______________________________
Philip T. Calder
Acting Chief Accountant
General Accounting Office
______________________________
Norwood Jackson
Deputy Controller
Office of Management and Budget
______________________________
Gerald Murphy
Fiscal Assistant Secretary
Department of the Treasury
1. This restriction on the scope of this interpretation does not imply that this treatment would be inappropriate for other fiduciary funds. Other funds were not included in the research supporting this Interpretation and are therefore excluded.